DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Hyundai XG vs 2002 Holden Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeHolden
XGModelVectra
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
139 HPPower141 HP
192 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4477 mm
1825 mmWidth1707 mm
1420 mmHeight1425 mm
1865 KgWeight1359 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Hyundai XG and 2002 Holden Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…