E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1979 Audi 80 vs 1979 Lada 2106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
AudiMakeLada
80Model2106
1979Model year1979
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
2/4Doors—

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
13,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1452 cc
75 HPPower72 HP
119 NmTorque104 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
4Gears—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
4383 mmLength—
1682 mmWidth—
1365 mmHeight—
930 KgWeight—
2541 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1979 Audi 80 and 1979 Lada 2106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1979 Ford TaunusVS1979 Audi 80Ford Taunus vs Audi 801979 and 1979 model years1979 Honda AccordVS1979 Audi 80Honda Accord vs Audi 801979 and 1979 model years1979 Saab 96VS1979 Audi 80Saab 96 vs Audi 801979 and 1979 model years1979 Lada 2106VS1979 Audi 80Lada 2106 vs Audi 801979 and 1979 model years1979 Opel MantaVS1979 Audi 80Opel Manta vs Audi 801979 and 1979 model years

Comments are loading…