E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1978 Audi 80 vs 1978 Saab 96 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
AudiMakeSaab
80Model96
1978Model year1978
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors2

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
13,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
119 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank38 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size155/80 SR15

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
4383 mmLength4300 mm
1682 mmWidth1590 mm
1365 mmHeight1470 mm
930 KgWeight930 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1978 Audi 80 and 1978 Saab 96 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1978 Ford TaunusVS1978 Audi 80Ford Taunus vs Audi 801978 and 1978 model years1978 Honda AccordVS1978 Audi 80Honda Accord vs Audi 801978 and 1978 model years1978 Saab 96VS1978 Audi 80Saab 96 vs Audi 801978 and 1978 model years1978 Lada 2106VS1978 Audi 80Lada 2106 vs Audi 801978 and 1978 model years1978 Opel MantaVS1978 Audi 80Opel Manta vs Audi 801978 and 1978 model years

Comments are loading…