1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 (70 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.25/100
1994 Audi 80 vs 1996 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.2 (45 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationOpel Combo
AudiMakeOpel
80ModelCombo
1994Model year1996
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors3
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationOpel Combo
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1195 cc
70 HPPower45 HP
118 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationOpel Combo
4405 mmLength4230 mm
1695 mmWidth1686 mm
1395 mmHeight1805 mm
1030 KgWeight1065 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Audi 80 and 1996 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…