1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 (70 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.25/100
1994 Audi 80 vs 1996 Mazda Protege Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.3 i (85 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Protege
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationMazda Protege
AudiMakeMazda
80ModelProtege
1994Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationMazda Protege
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1323 cc
70 HPPower85 HP
118 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationMazda Protege
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationMazda Protege
4405 mmLength4035 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1170 mm
1030 KgWeight1323 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Audi 80 and 1996 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…