DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Toyota Celica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
80ModelCelica
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
168 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
70 HPPower105 HP
118 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4420 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1395 mmHeight1300 mm
1030 KgWeight1200 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…