DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelAD
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
70 HPPower79 HP
118 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
4405 mmLength4175 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1395 mmHeight1480 mm
1030 KgWeight960 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…