DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Lada 2106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
AudiMakeLada
80Model2106
1992Model year1992
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1300 cc
70 HPPower64 HP
118 NmTorque92 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationLada 2106
4405 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1395 mmHeight—
1030 KgWeight—
2545 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Lada 2106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…