DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
80ModelSierra
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
70 HPPower72 HP
118 NmTorque119 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
4405 mmLength4425 mm
1695 mmWidth1694 mm
1395 mmHeight1407 mm
1030 KgWeight—
2545 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…