E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1972 Audi 80 vs 1972 Saab 96 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
AudiMakeSaab
80Model96
1972Model year1972
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors2

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1471 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
85 HPPower65 HP
121 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank38 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 96
4201 mmLength4170 mm
1600 mmWidth1575 mm
1362 mmHeight1473 mm
855 KgWeight873 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2498 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1972 Audi 80 and 1972 Saab 96 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1972 Moskvich 427VS1972 Audi 80Moskvich 427 vs Audi 801972 and 1972 model years1972 Moskvich 434VS1972 Audi 80Moskvich 434 vs Audi 801972 and 1972 model years1972 Saab 96VS1972 Audi 80Saab 96 vs Audi 801972 and 1972 model years1972 Dacia 1300VS1972 Audi 80Dacia 1300 vs Audi 801972 and 1972 model years1973 Opel KadettVS1972 Audi 80Opel Kadett vs Audi 801973 and 1972 model years

Comments are loading…