DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 80 vs 1987 Rover Maestro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeRover
80ModelMaestro
1986Model year1987
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
151 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1297 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
60 HPPower69 HP
100 NmTorque102 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
—Tyre size155/80 R13 79 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4000 mm
1682 mmWidth1695 mm
1365 mmHeight1430 mm
950 KgWeight925 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 80 and 1987 Rover Maestro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…