DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 80 vs 1986 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
AudiMakeOpel
80ModelOmega
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
151 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1297 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
60 HPPower90 HP
100 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
4406 mmLength4740 mm
1682 mmWidth1760 mm
1365 mmHeight1445 mm
950 KgWeight1230 Kg
2538 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 80 and 1986 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…