1990 • Audi
200
Audi 200 2.4 (136 Hp) 1990Overall Score60.5/100
1990 Audi 200 vs 1990 Toyota Hiace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Toyota
Hiace
Toyota Hiace 2.4 i (132 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Hiace
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Hiace
AudiMakeToyota
200ModelHiace
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Hiace
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2438 cc
136 HPPower132 HP
0 NmTorque204 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Hiace
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Hiace
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/60 R15Tyre size195/85 S R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Hiace
4807 mmLength4615 mm
1814 mmWidth1690 mm
1422 mmHeight1935 mm
1290 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 200 and 1990 Toyota Hiace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Hiace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…