2004 • Hyundai
Matrix
Hyundai Matrix 1.5 CRDi (82 Hp) 2004Overall Score50.25/100
2004 Hyundai Matrix vs 2004 Toyota Funcargo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Funcargo
Toyota Funcargo 1.5 i 16V (106 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Funcargo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationToyota Funcargo
HyundaiMakeToyota
MatrixModelFuncargo
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationToyota Funcargo
14,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
157 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
82 HPPower106 HP
187 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationToyota Funcargo
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationToyota Funcargo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationToyota Funcargo
4025 mmLength3860 mm
1740 mmWidth1660 mm
1635 mmHeight1680 mm
1370 KgWeight1075 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Hyundai Matrix and 2004 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…