2007 • Hyundai
Matrix
Hyundai Matrix 1.5 16V CRDi (102 Hp) 2007Overall Score60.25/100
2007 Hyundai Matrix vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Hyundai Matrix
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9 points.
60.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
HyundaiMakeMitsubishi
MatrixModelCarisma
2007Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
14,3 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
164 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
102 HPPower103 HP
235 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Hyundai MatrixSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4025 mmLength4475 mm
1740 mmWidth1710 mm
1635 mmHeight1405 mm
1280 KgWeight1185 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Hyundai Matrix and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…