1988 • Audi
200
Audi 200 2.2 Turbo (200 Hp) 1988Overall Score72.5/100
1988 Audi 200 vs 1987 Nissan Leopard Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Nissan
Leopard
Nissan Leopard 2.0 24V (210 Hp) 1987Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Leopard
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 200SpecificationNissan Leopard
AudiMakeNissan
200ModelLeopard
1988Model year1987
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 200SpecificationNissan Leopard
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
231 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower210 HP
270 NmTorque265 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 200SpecificationNissan Leopard
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 200SpecificationNissan Leopard
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/60 R15Tyre size215/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 200SpecificationNissan Leopard
4793 mmLength4695 mm
1814 mmWidth1690 mm
1422 mmHeight1370 mm
1300 KgWeight1440 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1988 Audi 200 and 1987 Nissan Leopard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Leopard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…