DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 200 vs 1990 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationVolvo 960
AudiMakeVolvo
200Model960
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationVolvo 960
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
165 HPPower190 HP
240 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationVolvo 960
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationVolvo 960
4807 mmLength4871 mm
1814 mmWidth1750 mm
1422 mmHeight1411 mm
2687 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 200 and 1990 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…