DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 200 vs 1984 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 80
AudiMakeAudi
200Model80
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 80
11,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
136 HPPower112 HP
180 NmTorque160 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size175/70 R13

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 80
4807 mmLength4406 mm
1814 mmWidth1682 mm
1422 mmHeight1345 mm
1260 KgWeight980 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2538 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 200 and 1984 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…