DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Audi 200 vs 1983 Audi Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Coupe

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationAudi Coupe
AudiMakeAudi
200ModelCoupe
1983Model year1983
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationAudi Coupe
11,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed189 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
136 HPPower115 HP
180 NmTorque165 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationAudi Coupe
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationAudi Coupe
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationAudi Coupe
4807 mmLength4349 mm
1814 mmWidth1682 mm
1422 mmHeight1350 mm
1260 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2542 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Audi 200 and 1983 Audi Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Coupe leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…