DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Acura RSX vs 1990 Saab 900 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 900

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura RSXSpecificationSaab 900
AcuraMakeSaab
RSXModel900
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats5
3Doors2

Performance

Acura RSXSpecificationSaab 900
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
130 HPPower141 HP
121 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura RSXSpecificationSaab 900
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura RSXSpecificationSaab 900
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 TR15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Acura RSXSpecificationSaab 900
4390 mmLength4680 mm
1715 mmWidth1690 mm
1300 mmHeight1420 mm
—Weight1190 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2515 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Acura RSX and 1990 Saab 900 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 900 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…