DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 100 vs 1994 Isuzu Mu Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Mu

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationIsuzu Mu
AudiMakeIsuzu
100ModelMu
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationIsuzu Mu
11,1 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
265 NmTorque226 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationIsuzu Mu
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank83 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationIsuzu Mu
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationIsuzu Mu
4790 mmLength4135 mm
1777 mmWidth1780 mm
1431 mmHeight1675 mm
1425 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 100 and 1994 Isuzu Mu approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Mu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…