DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 100 vs 1992 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
100Model626
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
16,8 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
167 km/hTop speed161 km/h
2370 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
82 HPPower75 HP
164 NmTorque169 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
4790 mmLength4700 mm
1777 mmWidth1750 mm
1431 mmHeight1400 mm
1385 KgWeight1265 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 100 and 1992 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…