DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
100Model4runner
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

16,5 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
166 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2370 ccEngine displacement2366 cc
82 HPPower114 HP
164 NmTorque192 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size225/75 R15

Dimensions

4793 mmLength4490 mm
1814 mmWidth1690 mm
1421 mmHeight1775 mm
1300 KgWeight1600 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…