DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 100 vs 1994 Mitsubishi Chariot Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Chariot

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
100ModelChariot
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
133 HPPower145 HP
186 NmTorque206 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R14 H
YesABS—

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4515 mm
1777 mmWidth1695 mm
1431 mmHeight1580 mm
1370 KgWeight1370 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 100 and 1994 Mitsubishi Chariot approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Chariot leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…