DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Hyundai Getz vs 2003 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeToyota
GetzModelFuncargo
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
170 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
82 HPPower106 HP
182 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3810 mmLength3860 mm
1665 mmWidth1660 mm
1490 mmHeight1680 mm
1050 KgWeight1075 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Hyundai Getz and 2003 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…