DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 AC ACE vs 1998 Lincoln Continental Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC ACE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ACMakeLincoln
ACEModelContinental
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
326 HPPower279 HP
427 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank76 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/45 ZR17Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4420 mmLength5260 mm
1870 mmWidth1870 mm
1300 mmHeight1420 mm
1510 KgWeight1745 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 AC ACE and 1998 Lincoln Continental approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…