DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 AC ACE vs 1992 Alpine A610 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC ACE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

81.5–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC ACESpecificationAlpine A610
ACMakeAlpine
ACEModelA610
1998Model year1992
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

AC ACESpecificationAlpine A610
5,7 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
250 km/hTop speed265 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement2975 cc
326 HPPower250 HP
427 NmTorque350 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

AC ACESpecificationAlpine A610
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC ACESpecificationAlpine A610
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/45 ZR17Tyre size205/45 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC ACESpecificationAlpine A610
4420 mmLength4410 mm
1870 mmWidth1760 mm
1300 mmHeight1180 mm
1510 KgWeight1420 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 AC ACE and 1992 Alpine A610 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…