E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1980 Saab 99 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 99

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 99
AudiMakeSaab
100Model99
1982Model year1980
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 99
10,3 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
136 HPPower147 HP
180 NmTorque236 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 99
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 99
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationSaab 99
4793 mmLength4394 mm
1814 mmWidth1689 mm
1422 mmHeight1435 mm
1210 KgWeight1130 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2477 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1980 Saab 99 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 99 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Audi 80VS1982 Audi 100Audi 80 vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Audi CoupeVS1982 Audi 100Audi Coupe vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Opel MantaVS1982 Audi 100Opel Manta vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1981 Opel AsconaVS1982 Audi 100Opel Ascona vs Audi 1001981 and 1982 model years1980 Saab 99VS1982 Audi 100Saab 99 vs Audi 1001980 and 1982 model years

Comments are loading…