1982 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.1 (136 Hp) 1982Overall Score60.5/100
1982 Audi 100 vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1981 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 2.4 (144 Hp) 1981Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Opel Ascona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
AudiMakeOpel
100ModelAscona
1982Model year1981
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
10,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
136 HPPower144 HP
180 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R14
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
4793 mmLength4321 mm
1814 mmWidth1670 mm
1422 mmHeight1380 mm
1210 KgWeight1030 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2518 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Audi 100 and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…