DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 100 vs 1989 Toyota MasterAce Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota MasterAce

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

54.25–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
100ModelMasterAce
1989Model year1989
EstateBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1975 cc
87 HPPower83 HP
172 NmTorque174 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

4793 mmLength—
1814 mmWidth—
1421 mmHeight—
1320 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 100 and 1989 Toyota MasterAce approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota MasterAce leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…