E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 100 vs 1992 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cresta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationToyota Cresta
AudiMakeToyota
100ModelCresta
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationToyota Cresta
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
137 HPPower150 HP
181 NmTorque194 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationToyota Cresta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationToyota Cresta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationToyota Cresta
4790 mmLength—
1777 mmWidth—
1431 mmHeight—
1370 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 100 and 1992 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1992 Peugeot 605VS1992 Audi 100Peugeot 605 vs Audi 1001992 and 1992 model years1992 Volvo 850VS1992 Audi 100Volvo 850 vs Audi 1001992 and 1992 model years1992 Mazda 929VS1992 Audi 100Mazda 929 vs Audi 1001992 and 1992 model yearsImage unavailableVS1992 Audi 100Citroen XM vs Audi 1001992 and 1992 model years1992 Volkswagen GolfVS1992 Audi 100Volkswagen Golf vs Audi 1001992 and 1992 model years

Comments are loading…