DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 100 vs 1992 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
AudiMakeMazda
100Model929
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
137 HPPower145 HP
181 NmTorque231 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
4790 mmLength4690 mm
1777 mmWidth1695 mm
1431 mmHeight1425 mm
1370 KgWeight1420 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 100 and 1992 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…