DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Toyota Chaser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Chaser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
100ModelChaser
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
168 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4690 mm
1777 mmWidth1695 mm
1437 mmHeight1375 mm
1430 KgWeight—
2692 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Toyota Chaser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Chaser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…