DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 100 vs 1989 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
100ModelLancer
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
170 NmTorque162 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4793 mmLength4235 mm
1814 mmWidth1670 mm
1421 mmHeight1405 mm
1250 KgWeight1060 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 100 and 1989 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…