DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Honda That S vs 1999 Honda Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda That S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda That SSpecificationHonda Z
HondaMakeHonda
That SModelZ
2003Model year1999
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

Honda That SSpecificationHonda Z
0 km/hTop speed130 km/h
656 ccEngine displacement656 cc
52 HPPower52 HP
61 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Honda That SSpecificationHonda Z
PetrolFuel typePetrol
31 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda That SSpecificationHonda Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
3Gears4
145/80 R12Tyre size175/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda That SSpecificationHonda Z
3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1620 mmHeight1675 mm
820 KgWeight960 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Honda That S and 1999 Honda Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda That S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…