DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Honda Stream vs 2007 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeGreat Wall
StreamModelCowry
2007Model year2007
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
158 HPPower143 HP
190 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4550 mmLength4574 mm
1695 mmWidth1704 mm
1605 mmHeight1845 mm
1460 KgWeight1510 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Honda Stream and 2007 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…