1997 • Honda
Stepwgn
Honda Stepwgn 2.0 i 16V (125 Hp) 1997Overall Score62.25/100
1997 Honda Stepwgn vs 1997 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 Turbo (147 Hp) 1997Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Honda Stepwgn
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda StepwgnSpecificationCitroen XM
HondaMakeCitroen
StepwgnModelXM
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Honda StepwgnSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
160 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
125 HPPower147 HP
181 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Honda StepwgnSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption14,5 lt
5,62 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Honda StepwgnSpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Honda StepwgnSpecificationCitroen XM
4750 mmLength4708 mm
1790 mmWidth1794 mm
1640 mmHeight1394 mm
1450 KgWeight1401 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Honda Stepwgn and 1997 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Stepwgn leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…