DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2003 Brilliance M1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeBrilliance
Sm-xModelM1
2002Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
131 HPPower129 HP
186 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank74 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption—
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4880 mm
1695 mmWidth1800 mm
1750 mmHeight1450 mm
1330 KgWeight1420 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2003 Brilliance M1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…