DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2002 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeRenault
Sm-xModelScenic
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
131 HPPower140 HP
186 NmTorque189 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4425 mm
1695 mmWidth1775 mm
1750 mmHeight1720 mm
1330 KgWeight1465 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2002 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…