DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2003 Chevrolet Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeChevrolet
Sm-xModelVectra
2002Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
131 HPPower190 HP
186 NmTorque122 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4480 mm
1695 mmWidth1710 mm
1750 mmHeight1410 mm
1330 KgWeight1245 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2003 Chevrolet Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…