DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Honda Sm-x vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeRenault
Sm-xModelScenic
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
131 HPPower140 HP
186 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4168 mm
1695 mmWidth1719 mm
1750 mmHeight1609 mm
1330 KgWeight1290 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Honda Sm-x and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…