DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Honda Sm-x vs 2000 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeHonda
Sm-xModelCR-V
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeCrossover
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
131 HPPower147 HP
186 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1750 mmHeight1675 mm
1330 KgWeight1490 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Honda Sm-x and 2000 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…