DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1996 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 940
HondaMakeVolvo
Sm-xModel940
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 940
7,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement2316 cc
131 HPPower131 HP
186 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 V
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 940
3950 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1750 mmHeight1425 mm
1330 KgWeight1360 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1996 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…