DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1995 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSuzuki
Sm-xModelVitara
1996Model year1995
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
131 HPPower136 HP
186 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption—
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4125 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1750 mmHeight1695 mm
1330 KgWeight1310 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1995 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…