DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMitsubishi
Sm-xModelSpace Runner
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
131 HPPower122 HP
186 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption—
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4290 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1750 mmHeight1640 mm
1330 KgWeight1228 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…