DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Honda S2000 vs 1996 Holden Apollo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda S2000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.

71.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeHolden
S2000ModelApollo
2009Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
240 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2157 ccEngine displacement2958 cc
242 HPPower185 HP
221 NmTorque264 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
Front tyres: 215/45 R17, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17Tyre size205/65 R15H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength4725 mm
1750 mmWidth1770 mm
1285 mmHeight1400 mm
1250 KgWeight1465 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Honda S2000 and 1996 Holden Apollo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…