DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
AudiMakeOpel
100ModelAscona
1982Model year1981
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors2/4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
14,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
173 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1979 cc
87 HPPower100 HP
172 NmTorque153 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
4793 mmLength4321 mm
1814 mmWidth1670 mm
1422 mmHeight1380 mm
1250 KgWeight1000 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…