1982 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.0 D Turbo (87 Hp) 1982Overall Score54.25/100
1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 Ford Escort Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.6 XR3i (105 Hp) 1982Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Audi 100
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationFord Escort
AudiMakeFord
100ModelEscort
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationFord Escort
14,0 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
173 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
87 HPPower105 HP
172 NmTorque132 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationFord Escort
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 HR13
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationFord Escort
4793 mmLength3966 mm
1814 mmWidth1640 mm
1422 mmHeight1337 mm
1250 KgWeight870 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2396 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Audi 100 and 1982 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…