1982 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.0 D (70 Hp) 1982Overall Score47.25/100
1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 Opel Ascona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 1.6 S (90 Hp) 1982Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Audi 100
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
AudiMakeOpel
100ModelAscona
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
17,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
70 HPPower90 HP
123 NmTorque126 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R13
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Ascona
4793 mmLength4366 mm
1814 mmWidth1668 mm
1422 mmHeight1385 mm
1210 KgWeight1015 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2574 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Audi 100 and 1982 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…