E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 Lada 2107 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationLada 2107
AudiMakeLada
100Model2107
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationLada 2107
17,9 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1569 cc
70 HPPower79 HP
123 NmTorque116 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationLada 2107
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank39 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
7 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationLada 2107
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationLada 2107
4793 mmLength—
1814 mmWidth—
1422 mmHeight—
1210 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1982 Lada 2107 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Opel RekordVS1982 Audi 100Opel Rekord vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Toyota CamryVS1982 Audi 100Toyota Camry vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Opel MantaVS1982 Audi 100Opel Manta vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Opel AsconaVS1982 Audi 100Opel Ascona vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Chevrolet MonzaVS1982 Audi 100Chevrolet Monza vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years

Comments are loading…